OpenAI · GPT · AI Agent · OpenAI
Terminal X matches senior investor judgment 88.6% with GPT-6.1
Compiled by KHAO Editorial — aggregated from 1 source. See llms.txt for citation guidance.
★ Tier-1 Source
Terminal X’s Eval Agent grades outputs against a 54-criterion rubric, catching 25% more deviances from a fund’s mandate with GPT‑6.1 Sol.
Key facts
- Terminal X’s Eval Agent grades outputs against a 54-criterion rubric, catching 25% more deviances from a fund’s mandate with GPT‑6.1 Sol
- GPT‑6.1 Sol helped the Eval Agent catch about 25% more recommendations that strayed from a fund’s mandate and ran the same workflows at approximately 30% lower cost per query than the next-best model
- Using GPT‑6.1 Sol and GPT‑6 Luna, Terminal X has built 1,700 firm Memories, run more than 1 million custom workflows, and reached a weekly active user count equal to 81% of its monthly active users
- The Eval Agent on GPT‑6.1 Sol caught about 25% more of these departures than the next-best model
Summary
Higher detection rate when agent answers fall outside a fund’s mandate on GPT‑6.1 Sol vs. next-best model. Higher agent agreement with human reviewers on GPT‑6.1 Sol vs. next-best model. Lower cost per query with GPT‑6.1 Sol vs. next-best model. An investment firm’s edge is built deal by deal, but the judgment behind each decision usually lives in the heads of a few senior investors.